When is un-augmented reality a better choice?

From what I can see, this is a great example of what augmented reality should NOT be. Endlessly clicking on low-rez photos of a place that you are already in. Comes to us via http://www.hci.uniovi.es/

Now, with all due respects to the video and the application, (Vadinia) the video depicts a nightmare augmented reality. Navigating through real space while tied to a handheld device. This would probably be better illustrated within a museum or other controlled area, with the point being – where does the user begin absorbing information for herself? When does the user begin to form her own impressions based on classroom learing? Can this type of information input – output be done through the interface? I welcome your comments and discussion….

  • iPod Accessories, iPod Nano Accessories, iPod Video Accessories and iPod Shuffle Accessories

    Augmented reality film: Future of Augmented Cognition

    This unusual film depicts a hypothetical team of augmented traders which apparently are in charge of managing asset trading during world crises in real time.

    They have really important jobs to do. When these high-performing traders are stressed, their headsets automatically prioritize the information they receive and minimize or maximize windows on their computer screens. We see the character “Claudia” stress out and the system helps her to focus in order to identify a suspect in the world unrest. Later, to calm her down the headset plays “a personal musical phrase” which “alerts her and supports the cognitive rebalancing process”. In other words, the headset knows when you are stressing out and provides you with direct-to-brain stimulation to keep your concentration stable.

    The technology shown would likely require a user which had been trained (perhaps from a young age) to use and rely on such augmentation. There are a couple of clues in the film that make the predicted reality believable:
    1.) the lives these characters lead are not that different from traders today and
    2.) the idea that this device could make those decisions about personal sensory input accurately is outrageous – but outrageous new technology is accpeted rapidly, and can become mainstream within a couple of years. That is the speed at which augmentation is adopted.

    Check it out and let me know what you think.

    From http://www.augmentedcognition.org/video2.html

    “This short film takes place in 2030 in a command center that is tasked with monitoring cyberspace activities for anomalies that could threaten the global economy. The economy, which functions largely in cyberspace, is the link between countries and is extremely susceptible to instability. As might be expected, given the ever-increasing amount of data to be analyzed even in today’s world, the workers in 2030 are inundated with information from all sources. They have so much information to contend with that they are literally unable to process it all unaided.”

    augcon.jpg

     



    Your Ad Here

    Cisco telepresence

    This official video from Cisco’s YouTube channel explains that the design of the system was centered on “human factors” and “the experience”. How much unspoken human communication can be transmitted through this real-time interface? Would people prefer to be “avatarized“? Like the video phone before it this may seem both useless and indistinguishable from magic. Either way, it illustrates further how “the Metaverse is not a simulation” but rather a newly created space that is experienced. Fascinating, Captain.


  • Motorola RAZR V3 Accessories, chargers, cables, software, holsters, cases, handsfree, earphones and more..

  • Is your telepresence ready for mainstream?

    Industry Week online Computerworld and Business Standard online have some new articles about telepresence – remote real-time, life-size conferencing. Businesses offering such systems include Teliris and Codian, Polycom, and Cisco Systems.

    Business Standard cites the average price of a telepresence system to be around USD$300,000. With a little math you can see that such a system would pay for itself in saved travel expenses within a very short period of time. Although the videophone has been available since the early 1960′s it never saw adoption specifically because the use of the voice telephone interface allowed freedom of movement, appearance, and multitasking that is simply not possible when looking at a small screen.

    picturephone.jpg

    What’s different now? The wall sized screens and bandwidth allow for a completely new experience.

    telepres_sm.jpg

    Notice how the participants in the video call it “unsettling” and “hard to get used to”. On the plus side – it makes everyone look like a news anchor! These systems are big, clunky and expensive now – how soon until telepresence is small, convenient, and cheap?